Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136969›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2025

Microfluidic Device on Fused Silica for Raman Spectroscopy of Liquid Samples.

Celia Gómez-Galdós, Andrea Perez-Asensio, María Gabriela Fernández-Manteca, Borja García García, José Francisco Algorri, José Miguel López-Higuera, Luis Rodríguez-Cobo, Adolfo Cobo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Celia Gómez-GaldósPhotonics Engineering Group, Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0009-0006-5302-7372
Andrea Perez-AsensioPhotonics Engineering Group, Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0009-0009-9565-0746
María Gabriela Fernández-MantecaPhotonics Engineering Group, Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7605-5409
Borja García GarcíaPhotonics Engineering Group, Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0009-0006-0686-483X
José Francisco AlgorriPhotonics Engineering Group, Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2654-583X
José Miguel López-HigueraPhotonics Engineering Group, Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-8487
Luis Rodríguez-CoboPhotonics Engineering Group, Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2068-2956
Adolfo CoboPhotonics Engineering Group, Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1498-9238

Funding

Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla INNVAL23/10Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla INNVAL24-28Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla PREVAL23/05MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2022-137269OB-C22MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 RYC2022-035279-IMCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 TED2021-130378BC21Universidad de Cantabria UC-22-09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water testing is becoming increasingly important due to dangerous phenomena such as Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs). Commonly, the content of a water sample is measured for the detection, monitoring and control of these events. Raman spectroscopy is a technique for the molecular characterization of materials in solid, liquid or gaseous form, which makes it an attractive method for analysing materials' components. However, Raman scattering is a weak optical process and requires an accurate system for detection. In our work, we present, from design to fabrication, a microfluidic device on fused silica adapted to optimise the Raman spectrum of liquid samples when using a Raman probe. The device features a portable design for rapid on-site continuous flow measurements avoiding the use of large, costly and complex laboratory equipment. The main manufacturing technique used was ultrafast laser-assisted etching (ULAE). Finally, the effectiveness of the microfluidic device was demonstrated by comparing the Raman spectra of a known species of cyanobacteria with those obtained using other conventional substrates in laboratory analysis. The results demonstrate that the microfluidic device, under continuous flow conditions, exhibited a lower standard deviation of the Raman signal, reduced background noise and avoided signal variations caused by sample drying in static measurements.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesSilicon DioxideSpectrum Analysis, RamanCyanobacteriaSilicon Dioxidecontinuous flowcyanobacteriamicrofluidicRaman spectroscopyULAE

Identifiers

PMID40136969
PMCPMC11940289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.