ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Novel Soft Dosage Forms for Paediatric Applications: Can We 3D-Print Them or Not?
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional printing as a transformative platform for patient-centric pediatric drug delivery: technologies, formulation strategies and clinical translation.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Review
- Current 3D Printing Technologies and their Potential Applications in Drug Delivery, Personalized Medicine & Pharmaceutical Sciences.Current drug discovery technologies · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensionally Printed Paediatric Medicines: Formulation, Process, and Regulatory Considerations.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Development of 3D-Printed Gel-Based Supplement-Containing Tablets with Tailored Release Profiles for Neurological Pain Management.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Pediatrics 4.0: the Transformative Impacts of the Latest Industrial Revolution on Pediatrics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past years, numerous novel dosage forms, including gels, have been investigated for paediatric treatment due to the need to provide flexible dose adjustment possibilities, as well as a patient-friendly approach to drug delivery. Simultaneously, 3D printing technology is continuously advancing and gaining interest as a tool for personalised formulation development. Multiple additive manufacturing methods, including the semi-solid extrusion, especially used in gel printing, provide flexibility regarding the dose of active ingredients and the adjustment of the design of soft dosage forms. 3D printing techniques can be considered as a possible answer to the demand for medicines tailored to small patients' needs. This review intends to present an overview of the current possibilities, comparing gel-like and non-gel-formulated dosage forms and crucial aspects of developing those cutting-edge dosage forms by 3D printing. This paper discusses soft formulations such as chewing gums, which still require extensive evaluation, and explores the question of the three-dimensional printing process. Furthermore, it highlights soft dosage forms, such as gel-based gummies and hydrogels, for which 3D fabrication has been intensively studied in previous years. However, the research still needs to advance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.