ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Yanbian Cattle Bone Gelatin Extracted Using Acid, Alkaline, and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Methods.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Characterization of Solution-Cast Polycaprolactone/MXene/Gelatin Composite Films for Biomedical Applications.Biopolymers · 2026Article
- Fish-derived biomaterials in bone tissue engineering: molecular mechanisms and scaffold innovations for enhanced regeneration.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Edible Films Based on Fish Gelatin and Soluble Soybean Polysaccharide Enriched with Tea Polyphenol for Active Food Packaging.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Yanbian cattle, a high-quality indigenous breed in China, were selected due to their unique biological characteristics, underutilized bone byproducts, and potential as a halal-compliant gelatin source, addressing the growing demand for alternatives to conventional mammalian gelatin in Muslim-majority regions. This study investigates the physicochemical and functional properties of gelatin extracted from Yanbian cattle bones using three different methods: acid, alkaline, and papain enzymatic hydrolysis. The extraction yields and quality of gelatin were evaluated based on hydroxyproline content, gel strength, viscosity, amino acid composition, molecular weight distribution, and structural integrity. Specifically, A gelatin, prepared using 0.075 mol/L hydrochloric acid, achieved the highest yield (18.64%) among the acid-extraction methods. B gelatin, extracted with 0.1 mol/L sodium hydroxide, achieved the highest yield (21.06%) among the alkaline-extraction methods. E gelatin, obtained through papain hydrolysis, exhibited the highest yield (25.25%) among the enzymatic methods. Gelatin extracted via papain enzymatic hydrolysis not only retained better protein structure but also exhibited higher hydroxyproline content (19.13 g/100 g), gel strength (259 g), viscosity (521.67 cP), and superior thermal stability. Structural analyses conducted using SDS-PAGE, GPC, FTIR, XRD, and CD spectroscopy confirmed that papain extraction more effectively preserved the natural structure of collagen. Furthermore, amino acid composition analysis revealed that gelatin extracted via papain hydrolysis contained higher levels of essential residues, such as glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline, emphasizing the mild and efficient nature of enzymatic treatment. These findings suggest that, compared with acid and alkaline extraction methods, enzymatic hydrolysis has potential advantages in gelatin production. Yanbian cattle bone gelatin shows promise as an alternative source for halal gelatin production. This study also provides insights into optimizing gelatin production to enhance its functionality and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.