ArticleCells2025
The Effects of Electrical Stimulation on a 3D Osteoblast Cell Model.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrical Stimulation of Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Schwann Cells for Regulating Extracellular Vesicle Biogenesis and Inflammation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimizing Alternating Current Electrical Stimulation Parameters to Enhance Osteoblasts Differentiation.BioFactors (Oxford, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrical stimulation has been used with tissue engineering-based models to develop three-dimensional (3D), dynamic, research models that are more physiologically relevant than static two-dimensional (2D) cultures. For bone tissue, the effect of electrical stimulation has focused on promoting healing and regeneration of tissue to prevent bone loss. However, electrical stimulation can also potentially affect mature bone parenchymal cells such as osteoblasts to guide bone formation and the secretion of paracrine or endocrine factors. Due to a lack of physiologically relevant models, these phenomena have not been studied in detail. In vitro electrical stimulation models can be useful for gaining an understanding of bone physiology and its effects on paracrine tissues under different physiological and pathological conditions. Here, we use a 3D, dynamic, in vitro model of bone to study the effects of electrical stimulation conditions on protein and gene expression of SaOS-2 human osteosarcoma osteoblast-like cells. We show that different stimulation regimens, including different frequencies, exposure times, and stimulation patterns, can have different effects on the expression and secretion of the osteoblastic markers alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin. These results reveal that electrical stimulation can potentially be used to guide osteoblast gene and protein expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.