Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136633›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2025

International Survey on Phenylketonuria Newborn Screening.

Domen Trampuž, Peter C J I Schielen, Rolf H Zetterström, Maurizio Scarpa, François Feillet, Viktor Kožich, Trine Tangeraas, Ana Drole Torkar, Matej Mlinarič, Daša Perko and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Current Status of Newborn Screening in Southeastern and Central Europe.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Domen TrampužClinical Institute for Special Laboratory Diagnostics, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Vrazov trg 1, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Peter C J I SchielenInternational Society for Neonatal Screening, Reigerskamp 273, 3607 HP Stichtse Vecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5630-7322
Rolf H ZetterströmCenter for Inherited Metabolic Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3016-0019
Maurizio ScarpaRegional Coordinator Centre for Rare Diseases, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0382-3251
François FeilletPediatric Unit, Reference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism, University Hospital of Nancy, 54500 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8717-469X
Viktor KožichDepartment of Pediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University-First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Ke Karlovu 2, 128 08 Praha 2, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5820-5277
Trine TangeraasNorwegian National Unit for Newborn Screening, Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3137-2117
Ana Drole TorkarDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Bohoriceva 20, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-0506-2919
Matej MlinaričDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Bohoriceva 20, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Daša PerkoClinical Institute for Special Laboratory Diagnostics, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Vrazov trg 1, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-6184-5627
Žiga Iztok RemecClinical Institute for Special Laboratory Diagnostics, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Vrazov trg 1, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-7650-6188
Barbka Repič LampretClinical Institute for Special Laboratory Diagnostics, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Vrazov trg 1, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0009-0003-6499-8666
Tadej BattelinoDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Bohoriceva 20, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Isns Study Group On Pku
Francjan J van SpronsenDivision of Metabolic Diseases, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9718 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3773-1929
James R BonhamSheffield Children's (NHS) FT, Sheffield S10 2TH, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-9485-6754
Urh GrošeljDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Bohoriceva 20, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-5246-9869

Funding

The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P3-0343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn screening for Phenylketonuria enables early detection and timely treatment with a phenylalanine-restricted diet to prevent severe neurological impairment. Although effective and in use for 60 years, screening, diagnostic, and treatment practices still vary widely across countries and centers. To evaluate the Phenylketonuria newborn screening practices internationally, we designed a survey with questions focusing on the laboratory aspect of the screening system. We analyzed 24 completed surveys from 23 countries. Most participants used the same sampling age range of 48-72 h; they used tandem mass spectrometry and commercial non-derivatized kits to measure phenylalanine (Phe), and had non-negative cut-off values (COV) set mostly at 120 µmol/L of Phe. Participants mostly used genetic analysis of blood and detailed amino acid analysis from blood plasma as their confirmatory methods and set the COV for the initiation of dietary therapy at 360 µmol/L of Phe. There were striking differences in practice as well. While most participants reported a 48-72 h range for age at sampling, that range was overall quite diverse Screening COV varied as well. Additional screening parameters, e.g., the phenylalanine/tyrosine ratio were used by some participants to determine the screening result. Some participants included testing for tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency, or galactosemia in their diagnostic process. Results together showed that there is room to select a best practice from the many practices applied. Such a best practice of PKU-NBS parameters and post-screening parameters could then serve as a generally applicable guideline.

Indexed as

cut-offinternationallaboratorymethodsneonatalnewbornphenylketonuriascreeningsurvey

Identifiers

PMID40136633
PMCPMC11943362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.