ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2025
Five-Year Outcomes of Patients with Pompe Disease Identified by the Pennsylvania Newborn Screen.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Update on Pompe Disease: From Existing Therapies to Emerging Curative Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Infantile-Onset Pompe Disease in Japan.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pennsylvania started newborn screening for Pompe disease (PD) in 2016. As a result, the prevalence of PD has increased with early detection, primarily of late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). No clear guidelines exist regarding if and when to initiate enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in patients identified through a newborn screen (NBS). To help define the natural history and indications for starting ERT, we present the long-term follow-up data of 45 patients identified through NBS from 2016 to 2021. These patients were evaluated at regular intervals through our multi-disciplinary clinic at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) with physical examinations, physical therapy evaluations, muscle biomarkers including creatine kinase (CK), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and hexosaminidase 4 levels (Hex4), as well as cardiac evaluation at certain points in time. We found that newborn screening of acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA) enzyme detected primarily LOPD. One case of infantile-onset PD (IOPD) was detected. Muscle biomarkers in LOPD were elevated at birth and showed a general downward trend over time. NBS GAA levels and initial CK levels helped to differentiate LOPD cases from unaffected infants (carriers, pseudodeficiency alleles), while Hex4 was not a meaningful discriminator. On repeat NBS, there was a significant difference between mean GAA levels for the unaffected vs. compound heterozygote groups and unaffected vs. homozygote groups for the common splice site pathogenic variant (c.-32-13T>G). Echocardiogram and electrocardiogram (EKG) are essentially normal at the first evaluation in LOPD. One LOPD patient was started on ERT at age 4.5 months. Continued data collection on these patients is critical for developing management guidelines, including timing of ERT and improved genotype-phenotype correlation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.