Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136383›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Patient and Healthcare Professional Reflections on Consenting for Extra Bone Marrow Samples to a Biobank for Research-A Qualitative Study.

Stuart G Nicholls, Erika Camilleri, Taryn Chesser, Gary Davis, Katya Godard, Grace Fox, Madeleine Jane Gordon, Krystina B Lewis, Jocelyn Lepage, Oksana Motalo and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Stuart G NichollsMethodological and Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0485-9069
Erika CamilleriMedical School, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada.
Taryn ChesserThe Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Gary DavisIndependent Researcher, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Katya GodardOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Grace FoxMethodological and Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Madeleine Jane GordonMedical School, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8725-6145
Krystina B LewisSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Jocelyn LepageDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Oksana MotaloDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Wendy NuttallIndependent Researcher, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Craig PeleshokIndependent Researcher, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Caryn Y ItoThe Sprott Centre for Stem Cell Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Pierre J A VilleneuveDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0944-1721
Mitchell SabloffDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0122-6138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about patient perspectives regarding consent for obtaining extra research-specific bone marrow (BM) samples during the diagnostic procedure for acute leukemia (AL). This study aimed to better understand patient experiences with consenting to provide these samples and identify potential areas for practice improvement. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients treated for AL, 4-6 years prior to the interviews, and healthcare professionals involved with obtaining patient consent and sample collection. A total of 17 patients (14 agreed to provide a sample and 3 did not have a sample in the biobank) and 5 healthcare professionals were interviewed, achieving data saturation. Patients supported increasing public knowledge about research and noted the importance of friends and family in providing emotional support and retaining information. Despite time pressure and anxiety, the decision to donate a research sample did not require much deliberation. Proximal factors informing decisions included impact on patient health and family and anticipated, procedure-associated pain; distal factors included altruism and trust in healthcare professionals. Key information included expected pain and management, the purpose of research samples, and sample security and privacy. Our findings suggest that BM research sample collection may be facilitated through optimizing the environment where information is provided and the type of information provided, including pain management options and the value of the samples for current and future research.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksBone MarrowHealth PersonnelInformed ConsentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchacute leukemiabiobankbone marrowpatient experiencequalitative

Identifiers

PMID40136383
PMCPMC11941294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.