ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Understanding the Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Decision-Making in Early-Phase Dose-Finding Clinical Trials.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Symptom Reporting for Treatment Readiness Before Daratumumab: A Blinded Prospective Study in Multiple Myeloma.Hematology reports · 2026Article
- International Consensus-Driven Recommendations for Patient-Reported Outcome Research Objectives in Early Phase Dose-Finding Oncology Trials: OPTIMISE-ROR.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Nurses' perspectives on the implementation of patient-reported outcomes: a descriptive qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In early-phase dose-finding clinical trials, integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is essential for enhancing patient-centered decision-making. This short communication advocates for several key practices to achieve such integration. Firstly, foster patient-centered communication that ensures patient understanding of the potential benefits of early-phase trials, thereby mitigating therapeutic misconceptions. Secondly, (a) facilitate partnerships to understand and address the underlying reasons for discrepancies between clinician and patient reports of adverse events and (b) facilitate partnerships among clinical trialists, statisticians, clinicians, patients, and advocates to gain diverse perspectives of adverse events and in so doing ensure that patients comprehend how their data will be used. Thirdly, optimize trial design and data collection by (a) determining optimal and feasible frequencies for PRO collection to minimize patient burden while maintaining data integrity and (b) effectively incorporating concordant PROs to guide dose recommendation decisions and adapt trial designs and statistical methods accordingly. Future research will involve investigating the application of these practices in patients within the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center Catchment Area. By integrating these recommendations, early-phase dose-finding clinical trials have the potential to achieve more informed and patient-centered objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.