Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136374›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

A Systematic Review of SBRT Boost for Cervical Cancer Patients Who Cannot Benefit from Brachytherapy.

Iozsef Gazsi, Loredana G Marcu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Iozsef GazsiFaculty of Physics, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania.
Loredana G MarcuFaculty of Informatics & Science, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6703-979X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy has emerged as a promising alternative to brachytherapy, delivering high doses to tumors with precision while sparing surrounding organs. This systematic review evaluates the role of SBRT as a boost for patients who are ineligible for brachytherapy. A total of 17 studies, involving 288 patients, were analyzed, focusing on dosimetric parameters and toxicity. The radiation regimens varied in dose and fractionation schedules, with external beam doses ranging from 44 to 61.6 Gy, and SBRT boost doses ranging from 5 to 30 Gy. The total EQD

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBrachytherapyFemaleHumansgynecologic cancerstereotactic body radiation therapytoxicitytumor control

Identifiers

PMID40136374
PMCPMC11941556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.