ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Toward Timely and Equitable Advanced Biomarker Testing for Patients with Metastatic Cancer in Canada.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Quality Gaps and Clinician Perspectives on AI Integration in Colorectal Cancer NGS Pathways.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Perspectives in educating molecular pathologists on liquid biopsy: Toward integrative, equitable, and decentralized precision oncology.Molecular oncology · 2026Review
- Life Years Gained and Healthcare Dollars Saved: National Economic Evidence Supporting Comprehensive Genomic Profiling as Standard of Care for Canadian Cancer Patients.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Lessons from a National Liquid Biopsy Program to Provide Cancer Testing and Treatment for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Exploring Cancer Patients' and Caregivers' Perspectives and Knowledge Regarding Biomarker Testing in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The explosion in biomarker testing over the past two decades continues to transform cancer care in Canada and around the world. Precision medicine is supported by identifying actionable mutations that direct therapeutic choices, thus improving survival and quality of life, especially for patients with advanced/metastatic disease. In addition, our growing understanding of the genetic basis of cancer is advanced by research employing ever-expanding databases of genetic mutations, therapies and outcomes. Despite this promising progress, however, access to biomarker testing remains inequitable across Canada, to the detriment of patients. Several underlying factors contribute to this situation, including the need for investment in and standardization of laboratory medicine infrastructure and processes, and the lack of suitable methods for cost/benefit evaluations to inform funding decisions. In 2024, a Canadian conference brought together patients, clinicians, researchers, policy-makers and scientists to address "Equitable Access to Advanced Biomarker Testing for Canadian Metastatic Cancer Patients". Two major themes arose from the conference: the urgent need to adopt comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) as a standard of care across Canada, and the emerging role of liquid biopsy in accelerating access to biomarker testing for patients with advanced/metastatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.