Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136333›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Feasibility and Acceptability of Social Prescribing for Cancer Survivors.

Deirdre Connolly, Chloe O'Hara, Catherine O'Brien, Adrienne Dempsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Social prescribing for people recovering from treatment for cancer: a systematic scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Deirdre ConnollyDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D08 W9RT Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8539-8123
Chloe O'HaraDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D08 W9RT Dublin, Ireland.
Catherine O'BrienTrinity St. James' Cancer Institute, St. James' Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.
Adrienne DempseyFatima Family Resource Centre, D08 DKP6 Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Faculty of Health Sciences Dean's Research Initiative Award N/AIrish Cancer Society N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following cancer treatment, individuals experience a range of physical, mental and social health difficulties that interfere with their ability to resume participation in pre-cancer activities. In Ireland, the National Cancer Strategy recommends community-based services to address post-treatment difficulties. Social prescribing is a community-based, non-medical service that links individuals with health-related activities and supports in their community. This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of social prescribing for cancer survivors. A mixed methods study was undertaken with individuals who had completed curative treatment for any cancer type. Recruitment was carried out in a national cancer centre. Quantitative outcomes included feasibility metrics (recruitment, intervention adherence and retention), the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), the Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HADS), the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF), and EORTC QLQ-C30. Qualitative interviews explored acceptability of social prescribing. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics (quantitative data) and content analysis (qualitative data). Out of 131 individuals identified as eligible to participate, 43 agreed to participate (32.8% recruitment) and 27 met a link worker and were connected to a local activity (62.7% adherence) and completed follow-up outcome measures (62.7% retention). Improvements were observed in all health-related outcomes and those interviewed identified the intervention as acceptable. Study participants attended a range of community-based activities as a result of link worker support. They also reported increased confidence, improved mental health and reduction in fatigue following attendance at community-based activities. The findings of this study indicate that social prescribing is a feasible and acceptable community-based intervention to improve the physical, mental and social health of individuals living with and beyond cancer. A pilot randomised trial is indicated to inform a definitive intervention trial.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsSocial SupportAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSocial Prescribingcancer survivorscommunity-based activities and servicesfeasibility and acceptabilitymental and social healthphysicalsocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID40136333
PMCPMC11940869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.