ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Feasibility and Acceptability of Social Prescribing for Cancer Survivors.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Qualitative Study of Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer in the United States.Oncology and therapy · 2026Article
- The role of social engagement and support in the association between combined caregiver-cancer survivor status and depressive symptoms.The Gerontologist · 2026Article
- Educational Needs Regarding Mental Health of Professionals Working with Young Adults with Cancer: A European Survey.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Social prescribing for people recovering from treatment for cancer: a systematic scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Following cancer treatment, individuals experience a range of physical, mental and social health difficulties that interfere with their ability to resume participation in pre-cancer activities. In Ireland, the National Cancer Strategy recommends community-based services to address post-treatment difficulties. Social prescribing is a community-based, non-medical service that links individuals with health-related activities and supports in their community. This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of social prescribing for cancer survivors. A mixed methods study was undertaken with individuals who had completed curative treatment for any cancer type. Recruitment was carried out in a national cancer centre. Quantitative outcomes included feasibility metrics (recruitment, intervention adherence and retention), the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), the Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HADS), the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF), and EORTC QLQ-C30. Qualitative interviews explored acceptability of social prescribing. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics (quantitative data) and content analysis (qualitative data). Out of 131 individuals identified as eligible to participate, 43 agreed to participate (32.8% recruitment) and 27 met a link worker and were connected to a local activity (62.7% adherence) and completed follow-up outcome measures (62.7% retention). Improvements were observed in all health-related outcomes and those interviewed identified the intervention as acceptable. Study participants attended a range of community-based activities as a result of link worker support. They also reported increased confidence, improved mental health and reduction in fatigue following attendance at community-based activities. The findings of this study indicate that social prescribing is a feasible and acceptable community-based intervention to improve the physical, mental and social health of individuals living with and beyond cancer. A pilot randomised trial is indicated to inform a definitive intervention trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.