ArticleJAMA network open2025
Patient Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Nonendemic Regions.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- SEOM-TTCC clinical guideline for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (update 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Guideline
- Association of patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) scores with survival outcomes in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma with osseous metastases in an 8-year-old girl: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Survival and patterns of recurrence in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma from a non-endemic region-A German multicenter analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Epstein-Barr virus based biomarkers and targeted therapies in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a narrative review.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- Advances in the Research of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Perspective.Cancer innovation · 2026Review
- Epstein-Barr Virus-Mediated Apoptosis Evasion in Epithelial Malignancies: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.Biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Race, Ethnicity, and Nasopharyngeal Cancer Subtypes in the US.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes and patient profiles following intensity-modulated radio-chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer in a nonendemic region.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Achieving control of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the role of Epstein-Barr virus-based screening and vaccines.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Co-targeting MRPS7-23 synergistically enhances cisplatin efficacy to suppress nasopharyngeal carcinoma growth and metastasis.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
- The Impact of Demographic and Clinico-Pathological Characteristics on Recurrence-Free Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Cancers · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Histological Subtypes and Clinical Factors in Non-Endemic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Screening of Theaflavins That Inhibit Proliferation of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells Through Metabolomics Approaches.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) presents unique challenges in nonendemic regions, with varying patient characteristics and outcomes compared with endemic populations. Objective: To fill gaps in the current understanding of NPC by focusing on a US population, comparing patient characteristics and treatment outcomes with endemic populations, and identifying key factors to inform management and follow-up protocols in Western health care settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients with NPC treated at a single large US tertiary academic medical center from 2000 to 2023. The study analyzed patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes. Data were analyzed from January to July 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and recurrence-free survival, stratified by patient characteristics, tumor types, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, and p16 expression. Results: The sample included 159 adult patients with NPC (median [range] age, 53.5 [18-90] years; 117 [73.6%] male), with 23 African American patients (15.3%), 21 Asian patients (14.0%), and 106 White patients (70.7%). World Health Organization type III tumors predominated (88 patients [68.8%]), followed by type II (25 patients [19.5%]) and type I (15 patients [11.7%]). EBV positivity rates varied significantly by race (Asian: 13 patients [81.3%]; African American: 17 patients [63.0%]; White: 40 patients [47.0%]; P = .03) and WHO type (type III: 50 patients [72.5%]; type II: 10 patients [48.0%]; type I: 0 patients; P < .001). p16 status, a proxy for human papillomavirus status, did not vary by race but did vary by histopathologies (type III: 12 patients [28.5%]; type II: 12 patients [63.0%]; type I: 3 patients [43.0%]; P = .04). On Kaplan-Meier curves, stratifying p16 by EBV status eliminated its assumed association with OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that increasing age (hazard ratio [HR] per 1-year increase, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.00-1.05]; P = .04) and former smoking status (HR, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.03-5.10]; P = .04) were associated with inferior OS, while WHO type III tumors were associated with better OS compared with type I (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.17-0.87]; P = .02). Male sex was associated with worse PFS (HR, 5.35 [95% CI, 1.23-23.30]; P = .03). For recurrence-free survival, former smokers (HR, 25.24 [95% CI, 2.56-249.23]; P = .006), current smokers (HR, 44.97 [95% CI, 2.27-892.10]; P = .01), and patients with advanced stages (IVa/b) (HR, 261.34 [95% CI, 3.96-17 258.06]; P = .009) had significantly increased risk. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study contributes to the evolving body of knowledge on NPC in nonendemic regions, finding a shift toward WHO type III tumors and underscoring the association of EBV status with survival outcomes, while highlighting the lack of association between human papillomavirus status and outcomes. Smoking history, advanced stage at diagnosis, male sex, and increasing age emerged as adverse factors. Notably, WHO type I tumors demonstrated particularly poor outcomes, highlighting the need for more intensive follow-up in this subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.