Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136291›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025

Comparing the Performance of Stress-Strain Index Versions 1 and 2 in Normal and Keratoconus Patients.

Nan-Ji Lu, Marta Jiménez-García, Ahmed Elsheikh, Ahmed Makarem, Carina Koppen, Jos J Rozema

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nan-Ji LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Marta Jiménez-GarcíaVisual Optics Lab Antwerp (VOLANTIS), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Ahmed ElsheikhSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ahmed MakaremSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Carina KoppenVisual Optics Lab Antwerp (VOLANTIS), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Jos J RozemaVisual Optics Lab Antwerp (VOLANTIS), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the Stress-Strain Index versions 1 and 2 (SSI and SSI2) in healthy patients and patients with keratoconus (KC). Methods: Fifty-two healthy and 104 KC eyes were examined using Scheimpflug-based tomography and air-puff tonometry (Pentacam and Corvis). Correlations between both versions of SSI and age, thinnest pachymetry, and tomographic parameters were assessed. To discriminate KC eyes from healthy eyes, receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for both versions of SSI and compared with a Delong test. Results: Both versions of SSI showed statistical differences between the healthy group and the group of patients with KC (all P < 0.001). In the healthy group, significant correlations were found between both versions of SSI and age, K1, K2, and Kmax, between SSI and average relational thickness (ART) Max (R2 = 0.23) and between SSI2 and Belin A (R2 = 0.08). In the KC group, significant correlations were found between both versions of SSI and all tomographic parameters (all P < 0.01, except for SSI2 with age P = 0.346); the R2 values in SSI2 were consistently higher than in SSI. AUC for SSI and SSI2 when comparing normal and KC eyes was 0.772 and 0.740, respectively (P = 0.468). Conclusions: Both versions of SSI correlated with tomographic parameters describing KC severity, but correlations were higher for SSI2 and were not affected by age. Both versions demonstrated the same diagnostic ability for KC. Translational Relevance: Both versions of SSI are not interchangeable, SSI2 may be preferred to depict the corneal stiffness.

Indexed as

CorneaKeratoconusAdolescentAdultCorneal PachymetryCorneal TopographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveTonometry, OcularYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40136291
PMCPMC11951061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.