Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136267›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2025

Confidence and Insight into Working Memory Are Shaped by Attention and Recent Performance.

Sammi R Chekroud, Anna C Nobre, Nils Kolling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sammi R ChekroudUniversity of Oxford.ORCID 0000-0003-1041-5026
Anna C NobreUniversity of Oxford.
Nils KollingUniversity of Oxford.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R010803/1European Research Council 101076247Glyn Humphreys ScholarshipJames S. McDonnell Foundation 220020448NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research CentreWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging 203139/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 104571Wellcome Trust 104571/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory is capacity-limited, and our ability to access information from working memory is variable, but selective attention to working memory contents can improve performance. People are able to make introspective judgments regarding the quality of their memories, and these judgments are linked to objective memory performance. However, it remains unknown whether benefits of internally directed attention on memory performance occur alongside commensurate changes in introspective judgments. Across two experiments, we used retrospective cues (retrocues) during working-memory maintenance to direct attention to items in memory. We then examined their consequence on introspective judgments. In the second experiment, we provided trial-wise feedback on performance. We found that selective attention improved confidence judgments and not just performance of the probed item. We were also able to judge participants' genuine insight into working-memory contents through the correlation between confidence judgments and memory quality. Neurophysiologically, alpha desynchronization correlated first with memory error and then confidence during retrocueing, suggesting a sequential process of attentional enhancement of memory contents and introspective insight. Furthermore, we showed that participants can use feedback on the accuracy of confidence judgments to update their beliefs across time, according to performance. Our results emphasize flexibility in working memory by showing we can selectively modulate our confidence about its contents based on internally directed attention or objective feedback.

Indexed as

AttentionJudgmentMemory, Short-TermMetacognitionAdultAlpha RhythmCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40136267
PMCPMC7617916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.