Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136217›Full record

ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025

Assessment of mortality due to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection in public and private intensive care units in Brazil: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Thiago Domingos Corrêa, Thais Dias Midega, Ricardo Kenji Nawa, Ricardo Luiz Cordioli, Adriano José Pereira, Moacyr Silva Júnior, Bruno de Arruda Bravim, Niklas Soderberg Campos, Amanda Pascoal Valle Felicio, Angelo Antônio Gomes de Carvalho and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Thiago Domingos CorrêaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9546-3910
Thais Dias MidegaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1010-3711
Ricardo Kenji NawaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-7013
Ricardo Luiz CordioliDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7521-399X
Adriano José PereiraDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9467-6516
Moacyr Silva JúniorDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6479-1708
Bruno de Arruda BravimDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8290-8554
Niklas Soderberg CamposDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4768-0299
Amanda Pascoal Valle FelicioIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Municipal da Vila Santa Catarina Dr. Gilson de Cássia Marques de Carvalho;Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9900-6371
Angelo Antônio Gomes de CarvalhoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9320-9681
Andreia PardiniDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9810-0100
Raquel Afonso Caserta EidDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8241-3241
Rodrigo Dias RodriguesDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1648-9986
Marcele Liliane PesaventoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-8208
Leonardo Van de Wiel Barros Urbano AndariDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4356-3535
Bento Fortunato Cardoso Dos SantosDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4662-1959
Claudia Regina LaselvaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8285-9633
Felipe Maia de Toledo PizaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-0343
Miguel Cendoroglo NetoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8163-4392
Guilherme de Paula Pinto SchettinoInstituto Israelita de Responsabilidade Social, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2503-7144
Sidney KlajnerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-1047
Leonardo José Rolim FerrazDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1822-1568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis retrospective multicenter cohort study compared characteristics and outcomes of 5,790 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Brazil's public and private intensive care units. Patients in public intensive care units exhibited greater disease severity, more frequent use of organ support, and higher mortality rates compared to those in private intensive care units. The risk of in-hospital death was more than twice as high in public intensive care units. ■ Public intensive care unit COVID-19 patients presented with more comorbidities and higher severity at admission. ■ Public intensive care units required more invasive organ support (e.g., mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, and renal replacement therapy) but less non-invasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula than private intensive care units. ■ In-hospital mortality was higher in public intensive care units, with an increased risk of death even after adjusting for patient characteristics and illness severity at intensive care unit admission.

objectiveTo compare the clinical characteristics, use of organ support, and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to public and private intensive care units.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to four intensive care units from March 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. Patients with COVID-19 admitted to public and private intensive care units were compared. The primary outcome of interest, in-hospital mortality, was assessed using a hierarchical logistic regression (multilevel) model adjusted for study site and patient characteristics.

resultsA total of 5,790 patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the participating intensive care units, with 3,321 (57.3%) admitted to private hospitals and 2,469 (42.6%) admitted to public hospitals. Patients in public intensive care units were less likely to be male and had higher median SAPS III scores, Charlson Comorbidity Index values, and SOFA scores. They also required mechanical ventilation (53.1% versus 40.0%, p<0.001), vasopressors (43.1% versus 33.9%, p<0.001), and renal replacement therapy (20.3% versus. 14.5%, p<0.001) more frequently than those in private intensive care units. In contrast, patients in private intensive care units were more frequently managed with non-invasive ventilation (38.0% versus 66.8%; p<0.001) and high-flow nasal cannulas (18.3% versus 48.1%; p<0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in public intensive care units (40.3%) compared to private intensive care units (16.4%) (adjusted OR=2.96; 95%CI=1.94-4.51; p<0.001).

conclusionWe observed significant differences in resource utilization and mortality rates between patients with COVID-19 admitted to public and private intensive care units. Patients with COVID-19 in public care units face a higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared to those in private care units.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hospital MortalityHospitals, PrivateHospitals, PublicIntensive Care UnitsAdultAgedBrazilCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40136217
PMCPMC11999376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.