Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136149›Full record

Observational studyEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025

Epidemiology with real-world data: deep endometriosis in women of reproductive age.

Nilson Abrão Szylit, Luciana Cristina Pasquini Raiza, Anucha Andrade Schindler Leal, Sérgio Podgaec

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nilson Abrão SzylitHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SR Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9047-9283
Luciana Cristina Pasquini RaizaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SR Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-4174
Anucha Andrade Schindler LealHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SR Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4403-7895
Sérgio PodgaecHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SR Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9760-6003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSzylit et al. conducted a descriptive prevalence study combined with a cross-sectional observational study in a public primary care clinic. Using real-world data, they determined the prevalence of endometriosis in women selected without prior screening for the condition, employing pelvic and transvaginal ultrasound. This study represents the first of its kind in Latin America. This study represents the first investigation into the prevalence of deep endometriosis within outpatient services. Utilizing real-world data, this study explores the prevalence of endometriosis. The prevalence of endometriosis among women of reproductive age is 6.4% (based on real-world data). The prevalence of endometriosis in women experiencing pelvic pain is 34.2%. Infertility is 6.5 times more common in women diagnosed with endometriosis. The presence of palpable posterior cul-de-sac nodules or a retroverted uterus suggests endometriosis.

objectiveEndometriosis is characterized by the presence of glandular tissue or endometrial stroma outside the uterus. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of symptomatic deep endometriosis and the clinical factors associated with this condition in women of reproductive age.

methodsA descriptive prevalence study combined with a cross-sectional observational study was conducted between 2017 and 2021 at a public primary care outpatient clinic in Brazil. Women of reproductive age with at least one of the following symptoms were included in the study: deep dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, intestinal or urinary symptoms during the menstrual cycle, or infertility. A sample size calculation indicated that an estimated sample of 269 patients was required for the study. Qualitative variables are described as absolute and relative frequencies, while quantitative variables are expressed as medians and quartiles. Factors associated with endometriosis were analyzed using logistic regression and multiple models.

resultsData from 1,445 patients were considered. Among these, 92 were diagnosed with deep endometriosis, resulting in a prevalence of 6.4% (95%CI= 5.2-7.7) and 34.2% among women with pelvic pain (95%CI= 28.8-40.1). Women with palpable posterior cul-de-sac nodules (0R= 3.58, 95%CI= 1.68-7.63, p = 0.001) or a retroverted uterus (0R= 2.36, 95%CI= 1.28-4.37, p = 0.006) were more likely to have endometriosis.

conclusionUsing real-world data, the prevalence of deep endometriosis was found to be 6.4% in women of reproductive age and 34.2% in those with pelvic pain. The primary clinical variables associated with endometriosis are palpable posterior cul-de-sac nodules and a retroverted uterus.

Indexed as

EndometriosisAdolescentAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDysmenorrheaDyspareuniaFemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleMiddle AgedPelvic PainPrevalenceUltrasonographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40136149
PMCPMC12002848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.