Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136135›Full record

ArticleBrazilian dental journal2024

Economic Evaluation of Community Water Fluoridation in an Upper-Middle-Income Country.

Lorrayne Belotti, Paulo Frazão

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lorrayne BelottiDepartment of Politics, Management and Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo (Sao PauloState), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3224-0020
Paulo FrazãoDepartment of Politics, Management and Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo (Sao PauloState), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6111-8908

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to estimate the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of CWF for schoolchildren according to different population sizes served in Brazil. The economic evaluation was conducted from a societal perspective. Total costs were estimated using four variables across different population sizes: capital cost of initial installation, chemical product costs, system operational costs, and monitoring costs. The effect of CWF was analyzed in the context of the widespread use of fluoridated toothpaste, based on studies with Brazilian population groups. The total cost of dental treatment was estimated, including both direct and indirect costs, with a discount rate of 3.5%. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the robustness of the results based on measured parameter values. The costs averted due to CWF were US$174.40 and US$85.67 for children aged 5-8 and 3-12 years, respectively, and US$46.66 for those aged 7-12 years, according to the average effectiveness of CWF for each age group. The cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit ratio results were favorable in all scenarios where the population served was 6,000 or more inhabitants. Scenarios unfavorable to CWF were observed only in populations of up to 2,000 inhabitants. The economic evaluation of CWF in an upper-middle-income country proved to be a cost-effective oral health intervention and more economically advantageous, especially in larger areas for both deciduous and permanent dentition.

Indexed as

FluoridationBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisDental CariesHumans

Identifiers

PMID40136135
PMCPMC11654337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.