ArticleBrazilian dental journal2024
Kennedy class III and IV dental arches: Trueness analysis of digitization methods and 3D-printing step.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Kennedy class III and IV dental arches".Brazilian dental journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the trueness of Kennedy Class III and IV dental arches digitized by different methods and three-dimensionally (3D) printed using stereolithography technology in an in vitro setup. Reference casts (maxillary Kennedy class III and IV) were produced by computer assisted design and manufacture, and linearly measured at occlusocervical, interarch, and edentulous space dimensions. Intraoral scanner (IOS), extraoral scanner (EOS) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) digitized the reference casts. Each digital file was 3D-printed using stereolithography technology, totalizing sixty experimental casts (n=10 per group). The same measurements taken from the reference casts were performed on experimental casts. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test were used for trueness (distortion between the experimental and reference casts). Distortion was significantly greater for class IV when compared with class III and increased after the 3D-printing step. Among digitizing methods, IOS and EOS had a similar performance and casts from CBCT showed higher distortion, reaching -1.0 and -1.4 mm in the edentulous spaces of digital and 3D-printed cast, respectively. It was possible to conclude that the trueness of Kennedy class III and IV arches were different according to digitizing processes with higher distortion at the edentulous spaces when the cast was digitized by CBCT and converted to a 3D model, compared to IOS and EOS; and in the Kennedy class IV dental arch condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.