ArticleBrazilian dental journal2024
The Effect of Different Bleaching Techniques Using 6% Hydrogen Peroxide: Penetration Inside the Pulp Cavity, Bleaching Efficacy and Toxicity.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Tooth Sensitivity of Low- Versus High-Concentration Hydrogen Peroxide for In-Office Bleaching: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Trial
- Effect of Applicator Brush Use on Color Change, Hydrogen Peroxide Penetration, and Gel Consumption in In-Office Bleaching: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Effect of violet and blue light activation on in-office bleaching with 6% hydrogen peroxide: color change, penetration into the pulp chamber and bleaching gel stability.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This in vitro study aimed to quantify the penetration of hydrogen peroxide (HP), bleaching efficacy (BE) and toxicity in larvae in different bleaching techniques using 6% HP. Sixty maxillary premolars were divided in six groups (n = 10): Pola Luminate (PL), VivaStyle Paint On PIus (VS), PolaDay (PD), White Class (WC) and Whiteness HP Automixx (AM). A group not exposed to bleaching agents was evaluated as a control group (CG). Previously, the initial HP concentration in the bleaching agents was determined via titration and pH was measured with a digital pH meter. The concentration (µg/mL) of HP inside the pulp cavity was assessed using UV-Vis spectrophotometry. The BE (ΔE* ab and ΔE00) was evaluated with a digital spectrophotometer. The toxicity was evaluated in larvae model. Data from HP penetration and color change were evaluated for a one-way ANOVA and the Tukey's test, as well as Kaplan-Meier death curve for toxicity (α = 0.05). VS, PD and AM had an initial concentration lower than that the manufacturers reported. VS had a more acidic pH. PL and WC showed a significantly lower HP amount inside the pulp cavity when compared to VS (p = 0.001). Regarding BE, no significant difference was observed for ΔE* ab (p = 0.38), and ΔE00 (p = 0.42). No toxicity was observed when all 6% HP was compared to GC (p > 0.05). All 6% HP products tested showed bleaching efficacy, low penetration into the pulp chamber and were non-toxic to Tenebrio molitor larvae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.