ArticleClinical transplantation2025
Automated CT Image Processing for the Diagnosis, Prediction, and Differentiation of Phenotypes in Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peri-transplant frailty changes impact survival in interstitial lung diseases.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Phenotyping of chronic lung allograft dysfunction in the ScanCLAD study: a research letter.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Lung transplantation in 2025: a narrative review of progress, challenges, and the road ahead.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) after lung transplantation is a common complication with a poor prognosis. We assessed the utility of quantitative computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis, prediction, and discrimination of CLAD phenotypes.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed routine inspiratory and expiratory CT scans from 78 patients at different time points after lung transplantation. Mean lung density (MLD), parametric response mapping (PRM), percentage of air trapping, and airway wall morphology parameters were calculated using the image processing software YACTA. Diagnostic and predictive utility was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis and Pearson correlation.
resultsMarkers of air trapping showed promise for the diagnosis and prediction of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS); for example, expiratory MLD showed areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.905 for diagnosis and 0.729 for 1-year prediction. For diagnosis of CLAD with mixed phenotype, peripheral measurements (e.g., PRM of peripheral functional small airway disease: AUC 0.893) were most suitable. Markers of airway thickening (e.g., expiratory wall thickness at an inner perimeter of 10 mm: AUC 0.767) gave good diagnostic values for the undefined phenotype. CT biomarkers differed significantly among CLAD phenotypes.
conclusionsDifferent CT biomarkers are suitable for the diagnosis of CLAD phenotypes, prediction of BOS, and differentiation of CLAD phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40136064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.