Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40135965›Full record

ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2025

Insights and Experiences From the 'Gatekeepers': A Qualitative Study Exploring Clinician Perspectives on Providing Publicly Funded Prenatal Exome Sequencing.

Samantha Dayman, Melissa Graetz, Lisa Hui, Lilian Downie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samantha DaymanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Melissa GraetzDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Lisa HuiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Lilian DownieDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3914-5592

Funding

Norman Beischer Medical Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomics has improved etiological diagnosis for foetal structural anomalies. It is being increasingly utilised in prenatal investigation both in Australia and internationally. To date, literature reporting diagnostic yield according to indication has been available. There is limited literature around the challenges of implementation and other aspects of utility.

aimsWe aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of clinicians involved with the delivery of a state-wide public prenatal exome sequencing (pES) service in Australia. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis qualitative study was developed using a pragmatism framework. A multidisciplinary cohort of clinicians across all tertiary foetal medicine units in Victoria was interviewed. Inductive content analysis was used to understand the experiences, impact, and utility of pES.

resultsEight clinician interviews were analysed. The impact of pES on clinicians included: increased pressure, higher emotional toll, and balancing the benefits with resource limitations. PES was most useful when it provided prognostic information. The clinicians felt that pES had the most utility for patients when the result informed their decision about whether or not to continue a pregnancy. Clinicians acknowledged their 'gatekeeper' role and valued a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach. The main perceived harm for patients was the anxiety associated with waiting times for results.

conclusionsThis study provides insights into the delivery of a publicly funded pES program. Our findings highlight the importance of the multidisciplinary team in the successful implementation of genomic technologies in reproductive health.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelExome SequencingPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchVictoriaclinician perspectivesexome sequencinggenomicsprenatal diagnosisutility

Identifiers

PMID40135965
PMCPMC12794764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.