ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Incidence of Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa in Dutch Primary Care.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in Hospitalization for Eating Disorders and Related Suicidal Risk, Following COVID-19 Pandemic.Depression and anxiety · 2026Article
- The Incidence and Prevalence of Eating Disorders Between 1975 and 2024: A Commentary on Lee and Chi (2025).The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on incidence rates of anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) in Dutch primary care by comparing pre-pandemic (2015-2019) and in-pandemic (2020-2022) periods. We hypothesized that the incidence of AN and BN would increase during the pandemic.
methodThis retrospective cohort study used data from general practitioners' electronic health records from the Nivel Primary Care Database, representing ~0.8% of the Dutch population. Incident AN and BN cases were identified using DSM-5 criteria. Incidence rates (IR) per 100,000 person-years were calculated and compared using incidence rate ratios (IRRs).
resultsOverall incidence rates of AN and BN did not increase significantly during the pandemic (AN: IRR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.8-1.8; BN: IRR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.5-1.8). Non-significant increases in AN were observed among females overall (+29%, IRR = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.9-2.0) and among 10- to 14-year-old females (+28%, IRR = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.4-3.7). The BN incidence decreased significantly among females aged 20-24 years from 53.8 to 10.7 per 100,000 person-years (IRR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.0-0.9). DISCUSSION: Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not find increased incidence rates during the pandemic. The overall incidence of AN among females increased non-significantly by 29%. The previously observed rising trend in AN among 10- to 14-year-old females in 1985-2019 did not have a significant sequel into the pandemic era, although it increased by 28%. The BN incidence remained stable overall and decreased significantly among young adult females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.