ArticleInternational endodontic journal2025
Characterization and ex vivo modelling of endodontic infections from the Arabian Gulf region.
Article in International endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization and ex vivo modelling of endodontic infections from the Arabian Gulf region.International endodontic journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe microbiota of endodontic infections in patients from the Arabian Gulf region (AGR) is largely unexplored. While research in different global regions has investigated the microbial composition of such infections, studies using shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS) alongside culture-dependent techniques (CDT) are limited. There are also few in vitro biofilm models that reflect the microbial profiles of endodontic infections. Therefore, by employing SMS and CDT, this research aimed to explore compositional and functional microbial profiles of endodontic infections from the AGR. The research also sought to develop ex vivo biofilms directly from endodontic infection samples. METHODOLOGY: SMS and CDT were used to analyze 32 root canal samples from necrotic pulp. Patients' samples were categorized into two cohorts: symptomatic (n = 19) and asymptomatic (n = 13). Samples underwent sequencing followed by bioinformatic analysis to investigate microbial composition, resistome, virulome, and functional differences. Two representative samples (8R, 15R) were selected to develop ex vivo biofilms on hydroxyapatite coupons. Similarity between inoculum and developed biofilms was assessed using SMS and CDT. The reproducibility of developed biofilms was assessed based on microbial composition and relative abundance at the species level using correlation coefficient analysis.
resultsEndodontic samples had high bacterial diversity, with a total of 366 bacterial species detected across the two cohorts. Several antibiotic resistance (n = 59) and virulence (n = 82) genes were identified, with no significant differences between the cohorts. CDT identified 28 bacterial species, with 71.4% of the isolated bacteria having phenotypic resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics. SMS showed that the ex vivo biofilms were polymicrobial. Biofilm derived from sample 15R had 9 species and was dominated by Enterococcus faecalis, while sample 8R had 12 species and was dominated by Streptococcus mutans. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation between biological biofilm replicates, confirming the reproducibility of biofilm formation.
conclusionsThere was high bacterial diversity in root canal samples from necrotic pulp. Samples were shown to contain antibiotic resistance and virulence genes, with no differences evident between symptomatic and asymptomatic infections. A high number of isolated bacteria were resistant to clinically used antibiotics. Ex vivo biofilm models from clinical samples were successfully developed and reproducibly reflected a polymicrobial composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.