ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Single Center Experience on Endovascular Treatment of Occlusion and/or Stenosis of Bilateral Carotid Arteries.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCarotid artery stenosis is the presence of 50% or more stenosis in the internal carotid artery (ICA) according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria and is one of the leading etiological factors of ischemic stroke. The severity of stenosis is associated with stroke risk. The prevalence of bilateral carotid artery stenosis (BCAS) varies. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications associated with carotid artery stenting in patients with BCAS or occlusion in a comprehensive stroke center.
methodsThe data of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting (CAS) between January 2020 and September 2024 were scanned. The demographic data and comorbidities were noted from the patients' files. Then, the patients were divided into two groups. The first group is "bilateral 50%-99% ICA stenosis" and the second group is "one side ICA occluded contralateral side ICA ≥50% stenosis". Both groups were also listed as symptomatic and asymptomatic. Demographic and endovascular procedure data were analyzed.
resultsA total of 82 patients were included in this study, 69 male (84.14%) and 13 female (15.85%). The mean age was 69.46 ± 7.24. Hypertension (HT) was the most common comorbid disease (69.51%). Sixty-six patients (80.50%) were symptomatic and 16 (19.50%) were asymptomatic. TIA developed in one patient in the first group. Two minor (The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] 1-3) and two major strokes developed in the second group. Only three patients (two in the first group, one in the second group) underwent postdilatation balloon angioplasty.
conclusionEndovascular treatment seems to be an acceptable strategy in comprehensive stroke centers where the possible complication risks can be well managed in this group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.