Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40135415›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2025

Effectiveness of General Practitioner Referral Versus Self-Referral Pathways to Guided Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression, Panic Disorder, and Social Anxiety Disorder: Naturalistic Study.

Jill Bjarke, Rolf Gjestad, Tine Nordgreen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jill BjarkeDivision of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Haukelandsbakken 2, Bergen, 5009, Norway, 47 93057985.ORCID 0000-0001-8646-5092
Rolf GjestadDivision of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Haukelandsbakken 2, Bergen, 5009, Norway, 47 93057985.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-6927
Tine NordgreenDivision of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Haukelandsbakken 2, Bergen, 5009, Norway, 47 93057985.ORCID 0000-0003-1282-6902

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Therapist-guided, internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (guided ICBT) appears to be efficacious for depression, panic disorder (PD), and social anxiety disorder (SAD) in routine care clinical settings. However, implementation of guided ICBT in specialist mental health services is limited partly due to low referral rates from general practitioners (GP), which may stem from lack of awareness, limited knowledge of its effectiveness, or negative attitudes toward the treatment format. In response, self-referral systems were introduced in mental health care about a decade ago to improve access to care, yet little is known about how referral pathways may affect treatment outcomes in guided ICBT. Objective: This study aims to compare the overall treatment effectiveness of GP referral and self-referral to guided ICBT for patients with depression, PD, or SAD in a specialized routine care clinic. This study also explores if the treatment effectiveness varies between referral pathways and the respective diagnoses. Methods: This naturalistic open effectiveness study compares treatment outcomes from pretreatment to posttreatment and from pretreatment to 6-month follow-up across 2 referral pathways. All patients underwent module-based guided ICBT lasting up to 14 weeks. The modules covered psychoeducation, working with negative or automatic thoughts, exposure training, and relapse prevention. Patients received weekly therapist guidance through asynchronous messaging, with therapists spending an average of 10-30 minutes per patient per week. Patients self-reported symptoms before, during, immediately after, and 6 months posttreatment. Level and change in symptom severity were measured across all diagnoses. Results: In total, 460 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 305 were GP-referred ("GP" group) and 155 were self-referred ("self" group). Across the total sample, about 60% were female, and patients had a mean age of 32 years and average duration of disorder of 10 years. We found no significant differences in pretreatment symptom levels between referral pathways and across the diagnoses. Estimated effect sizes based on linear mixed modeling showed large improvements from pretreatment to posttreatment and from pretreatment to follow-up across all diagnoses, with statistically significant differences between referral pathways (GP: 0.97-1.22 vs self: 1.34-1.58, P<.001-.002) and for the diagnoses separately: depression (GP: 0.86-1.26, self: 1.97-2.07, P<.001-.02), PD (GP: 1.32-1.60 vs self: 1.64-2.08, P=.06-.02) and SAD (GP: 0.80-0.99 vs self: 0.99-1.19, P=.18-.22). Conclusions: Self-referral to guided ICBT for depression and PD appears to yield greater treatment outcomes compared to GP referrals. We found no difference in outcome between referral pathway for SAD. This study underscores the potential of self-referral pathways to enhance access to evidence-based psychological treatment, improve treatment outcomes, and promote sustained engagement in specialist mental health services. Future studies should examine the effect of the self-referral pathway when it is implemented on a larger scale.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionGeneral PractitionersPanic DisorderPhobia, SocialReferral and ConsultationAdultFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomeanxietybehavioral therapycognitivedepressionGP-referralguided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapyICBTmental healthpanic disorderpathwayspsychological therapyreferral pathwayreferralsroutine care clinicSADself-referralsocial anxiety disordertreatment effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID40135415
PMCPMC11962571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.