Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40135412›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025

Convolutional Neural Network Models for Visual Classification of Pressure Ulcer Stages: Cross-Sectional Study.

Changbin Lei, Yan Jiang, Ke Xu, Shanshan Liu, Hua Cao, Cong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Changbin LeiTrauma Center, West China Hospital, West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0001-5428-6003
Yan JiangNursing Department, Evidence-Based Nursing Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9813-3738
Ke XuEvidence-Based Nursing Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0005-7946-6448
Shanshan LiuEvidence-Based Nursing Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8367-6732
Hua CaoNeurosurgery Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0003-7797-7477
Cong WangEvidence-Based Nursing Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0000-3043-7869

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pressure injuries (PIs) pose a negative health impact and a substantial economic burden on patients and society. Accurate staging is crucial for treating PIs. Owing to the diversity in the clinical manifestations of PIs and the lack of objective biochemical and pathological examinations, accurate staging of PIs is a major challenge. The deep learning algorithm, which uses convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has demonstrated exceptional classification performance in the intricate domain of skin diseases and wounds and has the potential to improve the staging accuracy of PIs. Objective: We explored the potential of applying AlexNet, VGGNet16, ResNet18, and DenseNet121 to PI staging, aiming to provide an effective tool to assist in staging. Methods: PI images from patients-including those with stage I, stage II, stage III, stage IV, unstageable, and suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI)-were collected at a tertiary hospital in China. Additionally, we augmented the PI data by cropping and flipping the PI images 9 times. The collected images were then divided into training, validation, and test sets at a ratio of 8:1:1. We subsequently trained them via AlexNet, VGGNet16, ResNet18, and DenseNet121 to develop staging models. Results: We collected 853 raw PI images with the following distributions across stages: stage I (n=148), stage II (n=121), stage III (n=216), stage IV (n=110), unstageable (n=128), and SDTI (n=130). A total of 7677 images were obtained after data augmentation. Among all the CNN models, DenseNet121 demonstrated the highest overall accuracy of 93.71%. The classification performances of AlexNet, VGGNet16, and ResNet18 exhibited overall accuracies of 87.74%, 82.42%, and 92.42%, respectively. Conclusions: The CNN-based models demonstrated strong classification ability for PI images, which might promote highly efficient, intelligent PI staging methods. In the future, the models can be compared with nurses with different levels of experience to further verify the clinical application effect.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPressure UlcerAgedChinaConvolutional Neural NetworksCross-Sectional StudiesDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedartificial intelligenceclassificationCNNdeep learningimageimagingmachine learningneural networkpressurepressure ulcerskinsoreulcerwound

Identifiers

PMID40135412
PMCPMC11962570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.