ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
A Retrospective Study of Chemotherapy-Related Extravasation Events in Dogs and Cats.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChemotherapy extravasation is a potentially serious complication. There is a paucity of information in the veterinary literature investigating extravasation events, treatments, and outcomes.
objectiveEvaluate chemotherapy extravasation events and treatments in dogs and cats, adverse events (AEs), and overall outcomes. ANIMALS: Twenty dogs and three cats were included.
methodsRetrospective, multicenter, descriptive study including dogs or cats with suspected extravasation from chemotherapy. Information obtained included: signalment, extravasation details and treatment provided, AEs graded according to VCOG-CTCAE v2 criteria, and outcome.
resultsThe most common drug extravasated was doxorubicin, followed by carboplatin. Carboplatin extravasation (n = 5) resulted in Grades III-IV AEs, all of which required surgical debridement. Doxorubicin extravasation (n = 9) resulted in Grades 0-V AEs, two of which amputation was ultimately recommended, and one of those two was euthanized instead. Extravasation of vinca alkaloids (n = 5) and rabacfosadine (n = 1) resulted in Grades II-III AEs, all managed in the outpatient setting. Mitoxantrone (n = 2) and dacarbazine (n = 1) extravasation resulted in no clinical signs associated with extravasation injury. Seventy-eight percent (18/23) cases had extravasation occur during one of the first four treatments of chemotherapy, with 30% (7/23) occurring during the first chemotherapy treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Most cases (20/23) had mild to moderate or no AEs. Findings support that carboplatin should be considered a vesicant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.