Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40135290›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2025

Objective Turning Measures Improve Diagnostic Accuracy and Relate to Simulated Real-World Mobility/Combat Readiness in Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Peter C Fino, Prokopios Antonellis, Lucy Parrington, Margaret M Weightman, Leland E Dibble, Mark E Lester, Carrie W Hoppes, Laurie A King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter C FinoDepartment of Health & Kinesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Prokopios AntonellisDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8927-1274
Lucy ParringtonDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8507-9974
Margaret M WeightmanCourage Kenny Research Center-Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Leland E DibbleDepartment of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Mark E LesterDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Carrie W HoppesAdvanced Exposures, Diagnostics, Interventions, and Biosecurity (AEGIS) Program, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland Air Force Base, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Laurie A KingDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balance and mobility problems are common consequences after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, turning and nonstraight gait, which are required for daily living, are rarely assessed in clinical tests of function after mTBI. Therefore, the primary goals of this study were to assess (1) the added value of clinic-based turning task variables, obtained using wearable sensors, over standard general assessments of mobility, and (2) assess the associations between general assessments of mobility, objective variables from clinic-based turning tasks, and ecologically relevant functional tasks. Fifty-three civilians with mTBI, 57 healthy civilian controls, and 36 healthy active-duty military controls participated across three sites. Participants were tested in a single session that encompassed self-reported questionnaires including demographic information and balance and mobility testing including the use of wearable sensors. Lasso regression models and the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) assessed diagnostic accuracy. Partial correlation coefficients assessed the relationship between each variable with ecologically relevant functional tasks. Multivariate models revealed high diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC of 0.92, using multiple variables from instrumented clinic-based turning tasks. The complex turning course (CTC) yielded the highest multivariate AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.90 (0.84, 0.95) for a single task, and the average lap time from the CTC had the highest univariate AUC (95% CI) of 0.70 (0.58, 0.78). Turning variables provided added value, indicated by higher AUCs, over standard general assessments of mobility. Turning variables had strong associations with ecologically relevant functional tasks and outperformed general assessments of mobility, though there were slight differences in the relationship based on civilian versus military population. Clinic-based turning tasks, especially the CTC and modified Illinois Agility Test (mIAT), have high diagnostic accuracy, strong associations with ecologically relevant functional tasks, and require relatively short time(s) to complete. Compared to general assessments of mobility, clinic-based turning tasks may be more ecologically relevant to daily function. Future work should continue to examine the CTC and mIAT alongside other promising tools for return-to-activity assessments.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionGaitPostural BalanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelWearable Electronic DevicesYoung Adultassessmentconcussionmild traumatic brain injuryturning measures

Identifiers

PMID40135290
PMCPMC12169904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.