ArticleIJID regions2025
Article in IJID regions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uropathogenic profiles and antibiotic resistance in gynecological cases: a microbial surveillance study from Northeast India.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fosfomycin Trometamol in the Management of Urinary Tract Infection: A Focus on Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Resistance.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Phage therapy againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Knowledge of local antibiotic susceptibility rates is essential to strengthen antimicrobial stewardship programs. Methods: The centers spanned nine Indian States and three Union Territories. Urinary Results: Overall, low susceptibility (<60%) was observed for the standard oral antibiotics prescribed for cystitis: co-trimoxazole, 54% (36-68%); ciprofloxacin, 52% (29-55%); amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, 46%, (35-82%); nitrofurantoin, 39% (19-78%); and cefuroxime, 30% (15-62%). The rates for third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins were 49% (45-52%) and 60% (36-76%), respectively. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases ranged from 36-61% in India. Piperacillin-tazobactam 74% (65-87%), amikacin 76% (45-91%), and meropenem 81% (61-87%) exhibited higher activity. Fosfomycin was the most active antimicrobial, with 89% (92-97%) susceptibility. Conclusions: Oral treatment options for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.