ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2025
The aesthetic perception of orthodontic specialists, general dentists and laypeople regarding different smile displays for a patient missing one upper lateral incisor and the other one peg-shaped.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aesthetic Treatment of Bilateral Peg-Shaped Lateral Incisor and Restoration of a Harmonious Smile: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of maxillary lateral incisor agenesis ranges from 1% to 3%, with slight global variability. The unilateral agenesis of the maxillary lateral incisor is often associated with a contralateral tooth with microdontia or a peg shape and can have esthetic, functional, and psychosocial implications for patients. The aim of the present survey was to assess the perceptions of smile aesthetics among orthodontists, general dentists and laypeople on different treatment choices, modifying the initial condition of the right maxillary lateral incisor agenesis and the contralateral peg-shaped tooth. Methods: A series of 6 photographs of different smile simulations were presented to 109 orthodontic specialists, 109 general dentists and 141 laypeople through an online survey. Each photograph was duplicated and judged from 1 to 10 for 2 different bipolar adjectives. Results: Statistically significant results were found for all the groups investigated. All three groups preferred the photo that maintained the typical symmetrical 'high-low-high gingival contour. Moreover, both orthodontic specialists and general dentists preferred unilateral mesialization of the canine and conservative rehabilitation of the peg-shaped incisor. In contrast, the laypeople preferred bilateral mesialization of the canines with peg-shaped incisor avulsion. Conclusion: The normal symmetrical array of the central incisor, lateral incisor and canine had the best aesthetic results for all subjects. Laypeople were more attracted to a symmetrical smile than were the groups of orthodontic specialists and general dentists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.