ArticleArchive of clinical cases2025
Bilateral simultaneous proximal femoral fractures on dissimilar anatomical regions.
Article in Archive of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simultaneous presentation of bilateral proximal femoral fractures following a traumatic event are considered very rare injuries. A literature search revealed that the fracture pattern in bilateral simultaneous proximal femoral fractures is most commonly similar to the anatomical region. We report a case of traumatic bilateral proximal femoral fractures with dissimilar pattern and anatomical location following a low energy trauma. A 90-year-old female presented with a right extracapsular - intertrochanteric neck of femur fracture and a left intracapsular - subcapital neck of femur fracture following a fall. The surgical plan was to fix the right side with a dynamic hip screw (DHS), directly followed by left cemented hip hemiarthroplasty on the left. Anesthetic concerns were raised towards the end of the first procedure hence the hemiarthroplasty was postponed. Following medical optimization, a bipolar cemented hip hemiarthroplasty was performed 4 days later. The patient was discharged after 16 days with carers support at home. Careful planning should take place in cases of simultaneous bilateral hip fracture given increased morbidity and mortality. Operation of both sides in a single stage is acceptable to reduce the risk of anesthetic complications and reduce costs. Dissimilar or asymmetrical bilateral hip fractures present a unique challenge, primarily because of the need to change the patient's position. Communication between the surgical and the anesthetic team throughout any procedure is important, but even more so in high-risk cases. To our knowledge, dissimilar or asymmetrical bilateral proximal hip fractures in the elderly presenting simultaneously have only been described twice in literature. Their rarity necessitates careful preoperative planning. The aim should be to address both injuries in a single operation, however contingency planning is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.