ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
A Single-center, Double-blinded, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Dietary Supplement Containing Rosemary Extract on Visible Facial Skin Quality.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Djulis (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Reversing Oxinflammation Associated with Glycative Stress and Formation of Advanced Glycation End Products with a Dietary Supplement Containing Rosemary Extract.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Glycative stress promotes the accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), impairing extracellular matrix proteins and accelerating skin aging. Rosemary extract has been shown to deglycate AGE crosslink proteins. The safety of a dietary supplement containing rosemary extract (BioR) and its efficacy on skin quality parameters was evaluated over 12 weeks. Methods: The randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial included female participants, aged 40 to 65 years, with moderate-to-severe skin dullness and roughness/texture, and mild-to-moderate erythema, pore size, and uneven pigmentation based on a six-point grading scale. Subjects were randomized to either BioR (n=52) or placebo ([PLB] n=52). The dosing schedule was as follows: from Weeks 1 to 4, two capsules three times daily; from Weeks 5 to 8, two capsules twice daily; from Weeks 9 to 12, one capsule twice daily. Capsules were taken with food. Investigator assessments occurred at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12. Global skin quality (total sum of scores) and adverse events (AEs) were recorded over 12 weeks. Results: Mean age, severity and baseline demographics of subjects were similar across groups. Significant mean improvements in BioR versus PLB were observed in skin dullness ( Conclusion: Following 12 weeks of use, a dietary supplement containing rosemary extract and its natural cofactors led to significant mean visible improvements compared to placebo in skin dullness, roughness/texture, erythema, and pore size, and was well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40135175PMC11932106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.