Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40135158›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Community engagement approaches and lessons learned: a case study of the PRECISE pregnancy cohort study in Kenya.

Onesmus Wanje, Angela Koech, Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Grace Mwashigadi, Alice Kombo, Grace Maitha, Nathan Barreh, Hiten D Mistry, Marianne Vidler, Rachel Craik and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Onesmus WanjeCentre of Excellence for Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Angela KoechCentre of Excellence for Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mai-Lei Woo KinshellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Grace MwashigadiCentre of Excellence for Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Alice KomboCentre of Excellence for Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Grace MaithaCentre of Excellence for Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nathan BarrehCentre of Excellence for Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Hiten D MistryDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marianne VidlerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Rachel CraikDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marie-Laure VolvertDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marleen TemmermanCentre of Excellence for Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
PRECISE Network

Funding

UZIMA-DS: UtiliZing health Information for Meaningful Impact in East Africa through Data ScienceU54TW012089 · FIC · AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY (KENYA) · PI Amina Abubakar Ali, Akbar K Waljee · 2021 to 2026
$7.7M
FIC NIH HHS U54 TW012089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community engagement (CE) has been recommended as an important ethical consideration for health research to enhance informed consent and exchange knowledge between researchers and community members. The purpose of this paper is to describe how CE was developed and delivered for the PRECISE prospective pregnancy cohort study in Kenya. PRECISE enrolled pregnant women in antenatal care, followed them up to the postpartum period, and collected data and biological samples to enable the study of placental disorders in sub-Saharan Africa. Initially CE was aimed at informing the community about the study, establishing community-wide acceptance of the research and addressing concerns about biological sample collection to facilitate participation in the study. CE later evolved to be a platform for mutual learning aiming to deepen the community's understanding of research principles and informed consent and providing a feedback loop to researchers. We engaged diverse stakeholders including health workers and managers, local administrators, religious and traditional leaders, older women, pregnant women, non-pregnant women and men. We utilized a variety of CE approaches and tools adapting to the specific contextual factors at the study sites. Achievements included widespread understanding of informed consent and research principles, clarification of misconceptions, and dispelling of fears regarding biological sample collection. The relationship with the community was strengthened evidenced by frequent inquiries and active participation in CE activities and the research study. For effective CE, we recommend involvement of community members in the CE team and continuous and adaptive CE throughout the study period.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationAdultCohort StudiesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHumansInformed ConsentKenyaMalePregnancyPrenatal CareProspective Studiescohort studiescommunity engagementcommunity participationKenyalessons learntpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40135158
PMCPMC11933082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.