ReviewCanadian medical education journal2025
[Classification of the intensity of interprofessional learning in the context of clinical placements: a proposal based on theoretical foundations in interprofessional education and the results of a narrative review].
Review in Canadian medical education journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sleep deprivation and sleep debt among medical students, revisited.Canadian medical education journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: In terms of interprofessional education (IPE), clinical internships are an interesting opportunity to anchor theoretical knowledge of interprofessionalism in an authentic context. However, even if there is a diversity of experiences described in the scientific literature regarding placement contexts, objectives, and modalities, no taxonomy is adapted to interprofessional internships. Purpose: This article, therefore, proposes an original classification of the intensity of experiences and learning in the context of interprofessional internship experiences based on the modality of learning offered, the degree of experience with patients, the predictability and complexity of tasks required, the focus of learning and the duration of the internship. This classification is grounded in the theoretical foundations of IPE and on data from a narrative review analysis on this subject. Method: A narrative literature review was conducted to target articles on interprofessional internship experiences in health and social services. The analysis process unfolded through iterations between data collection from the articles and analysis based on the theoretical foundations of IPE and expertise of research team members. In accordance with the instructional design research specifications, this process led to the proposal, then to the validation, of a classification of the intensity of interprofessional learning in clinical placements. Results: This classification is composed of four levels suggesting an evolution of the intensity of the educational experience according to the modality and focus of learning, the degree of exposure to patients; the predictability and complexity of the tasks and the duration of the internship. Conclusion: This type of classification will help future instigators of internships to plan, rigorously, and coherently, the progression of learners' knowledge and skills development in IPE based on their program context and goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.