ArticlePsychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity2025
An Examination of Facilitators and Barriers to Care Receipt Among Specific Groups of LGBTQ+ and Cisgender Heterosexual Veterans.
Article in Psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study examined rates and factors associated with past-year Veterans Health Administration (VHA) overall healthcare utilization and VA mental health treatment among LGBTQ+ and cisgender heterosexual veterans. Baseline data from a national longitudinal study of LGBTQ+ and cisgender heterosexual veteran VHA users and non-users (N = 1,062) were used in generalized linear models to estimate the predicted prevalence of VHA healthcare utilization for each LGBTQ+ and cisgender subgroup, stratified by gender. Additional multivariable regressions were guided by the Andersen health services utilization model. There were no significant differences in healthcare utilization among women subgroups. Among men subgroups, cisgender gay men had lower predicted prevalence of VHA utilization than cisgender heterosexual and transgender men. In both the women's and men's models, VHA eligibility indicators and perceived lack of service availability were associated with increased odds for any past-year utilization; higher income, difficulty understanding eligibility/benefits, and logistical barriers were associated with decreased odds. Lifetime harassment at VHA was positively associated with past-year overall VHA utilization in women's models. LGBTQ+ specific factors explained significant variance in some models while transgender/gender diverse specific needs did not. These findings suggest that veterans generally need assistance navigating VHA eligibility issues and that LGBTQ+ veterans would benefit from systemic attention to provider sensitivity and availability of services focused on their needs. The high rates of harassment reported across women subgroups (19% to 25%) and by transgender men (38%) warrant institution-wide action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.