ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2025
Overview on biomarkers for immune oncology drugs.
Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunopathogenesis and Therapeutic Implications in Basal Cell Carcinoma: Current Concepts and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Tricyclic and Novel Chemotypes as Selective WRN Helicase Inhibitors for MSI‑H Cancer Therapy.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Targeting Werner Syndrome Helicase with Small Molecules in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cancers.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Pan-Cancer Analysis of CLDN3 and Its Contribution to 5-FU Resistance in Colorectal Cancer.IET systems biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in clinical oncology, less than half of treated cancer patients derive benefit from this therapy. Both tumor- and host-related variables are implicated in response to ICIs. The predictive value of PD-L1 expression is confined only to several cancer types, so this molecule is not an agnostic biomarker. Highly elevated tumor mutation burden (TMB) caused either by excessive carcinogenic exposure or by a deficiency in DNA repair is a reliable indicator for ICI efficacy, as exemplified by tumors with high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Other potentially relevant tumor-related characteristics include gene expression signatures, pattern of tumor infiltration by immune cells, and, perhaps, some immune-response modifying somatic mutations. Host-related factors have not yet been comprehensively considered in relevant clinical trials. Microbiome composition, markers of systemic inflammation [e.g., neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)], and human leucocyte antigen (HLA) diversity may influence the efficacy of ICIs. Studies on ICI biomarkers are likely to reveal modifiable tumor or host characteristics, which can be utilized to direct the antitumor immune defense. Examples of the latter approach include tumor priming to immune therapy by cytotoxic drugs and elevation of ICI efficacy by microbiome modification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.