ReviewCureus2025
Artificial Intelligence: A New Frontier in Rare Disease Early Diagnosis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patients' and Providers' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and Electronic Health Record Use in Deep Phenotyping and Rare-Disease Screening: An Empty Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Latest Developments in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models in General Pediatric Surgery.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2026Review
- Unifying the odyssey: artificial intelligence for rare disease diagnosis and therapy.Health and technology · 2026Article
- The expanding role of artificial intelligence in personalised medicine: from innovation to individualized care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in rare and intractable diseases: Advances, challenges, and future directions.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare diseases present significant challenges, including delays in diagnosis, inadequate treatment responses, and difficulties in monitoring. These challenges arise from the complexity of symptoms, limited medical expertise, and insufficient diagnostic tools. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has gained attention for its potential to improve healthcare, particularly in diagnosing complex conditions. By analyzing large datasets, recognizing patterns, and integrating clinical information, AI can refine diagnostic accuracy, enhance treatment strategies, and improve patient outcomes. This literature review examines AI applications in three key areas of rare disease diagnosis: genetic analysis, imaging-based phenotyping, and natural language processing (NLP) for clinical data extraction. AI-driven advancements in these domains have been explored to improve disease detection and management. However, several challenges persist, including limited data availability, algorithm transparency, privacy considerations, and ethical concerns. Efforts such as data augmentation and transfer learning are being explored to address these issues and expand AI's role in clinical practice. By refining diagnostic processes and optimizing treatment strategies, AI has the potential to improve the management of rare diseases. This review critically examines AI's role in rare disease diagnosis, with a particular emphasis on its applications in genetic analysis, imaging-based phenotyping, and NLP, while also addressing key challenges and future directions for clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.