Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40135032›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Beneficial Effects of a Lutein-Zeaxanthin Complex on Macular Pigment Optical Density Levels of Healthy Individuals With Prolonged Screen Time.

Vadiraj G Bharadwaj, Thirumalesh Mb, Ashwath Hv, Anzar Ca, Sundaram R, Prasad Cp, Joseph Mv, Bineesh Eranimose, Prasanna A Reddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vadiraj G BharadwajResearch and Development, Olive Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, IND.
Thirumalesh MbOphthalmology, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, IND.
Ashwath HvClinical Research, SCORES, Bangalore, IND.
Anzar CaResearch and Development, Olive Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, IND.
Sundaram RResearch and Development, Olive Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, IND.
Prasad CpResearch and Development, Olive Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, IND.
Joseph MvResearch and Development, Olive Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, IND.
Bineesh EranimoseResearch and Development, Olive Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, IND.
Prasanna A ReddyResearch and Development, Olive Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Macular pigment (MP), consisting of lutein (L) and zeaxanthin (Z), is believed to provide retinal protection against photo-oxidative damage. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of lutein and zeaxanthin complex 5:1 (extracted from marigold flowers) supplementation on macular pigment optical density (MPOD), contrast sensitivity, and quality of sleep in healthy subjects who exposed themselves to an electronic gadget screen for a minimum of 8 hours every day. This study also aimed to assess the long-term safety of the supplement by administering it for 8 months in one of the groups. The study also assessed the retention effects of lutein and zeaxanthin on MPOD after discontinuation of supplementation. Methods The study was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2022/12/048392). Subjects were screened as per the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects aged 18-55 years with a screen time of at least 8 hours daily and MPOD values below 0.8 were recruited. The study, conducted at Narayana Nethralaya Super Specialty Eye Hospital, Bangalore, spanned from December 2022 to May 2024. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Of the 96 volunteers screened for this study, 71 were recruited, and 60 completed the study. Subjects were divided into 3 groups, viz. A, B, and C. Group A received lutein 10mg and zeaxanthin 2mg twice daily for the first four months, had a wash-off period of 15 days, and continued with the same supplementation for the remaining four months. Group B received lutein 10mg and zeaxanthin 2mg twice daily for the first four months, had a wash-off period of 15 days, and then switched over to a placebo for the next four months. Group C received a Placebo for the first 4 months, had a wash-off period of 15 days, and then switched over to lutein 10mg and zeaxanthin 2mg for the next four months. All the subjects were given either, lutein and zeaxanthin complex-5:1 or placebo capsules as per the randomization chart prepared computationally. Subjects were analyzed for their MPOD values, contrast sensitivity scores, and quality of sleep. Intraocular pressure, retinal thickness, renal function tests, and liver function tests were conducted during visits to ensure clinical safety. Results After supplementation with the lutein-zeaxanthin complex-5:1, the average MPOD (at 1

Indexed as

blue light effectscontrast sensitivityheterochromatic flicker photometryliver function testslutein and zeaxanthinmpodquality of sleeprenal function testsscreen exposure

Identifiers

PMID40135032
PMCPMC11933726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.