ReviewCureus2025
Smart Accessibility and Quality of Life in Education: A Systematic Review of Adolescent Support and Universal Access.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Empowerment Model for The Elderly and Community to Improve the Welfare of the Elderly.F1000Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accelerated digitalization of secondary education following the COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally altered the nature of learner engagement and participation with various knowledge resources. From digital lessons to gamification to integrated smart technologies capable of supporting specific learner needs, the opportunity for inclusion and universal accessibility is unprecedented. This study represents an important extension of prior research in this field, combining multiple empirical studies regarding smart technologies, accessibility effects, and learner quality of life (QoL) into a blueprint for future educational applications. Through a systematic literature review (SLR), studies from multiple databases using multiple empirical methods have been identified and thematically compared. The findings reveal that while smart technologies have the potential to revolutionize inclusive education, accessibility gaps persist, particularly for students with special needs, leading to disparities in learning opportunities and outcomes. Such gaps stem from insufficiently adaptive technologies, inadequate teacher training, and limited resource allocation for underserved communities. By targeting a bottom-up, participative design approach to technological identification and integration, a broader range of student needs can be accommodated, and technological accessibility can be ensured for a larger percentage of the secondary student population. This study recommends improving educational outcomes for all students, especially those with special needs, by prioritizing the development of adaptable, inclusive technologies and continuous utility assessments. This research synthesizes findings from multiple studies to evaluate the impact of smart accessibility on adolescent learning and quality of life, providing a framework for assessing and improving technological integration in secondary education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.