ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Assisted suicide within long-term care facilities for older adults: organizational issues and processes experienced by health and social care providers in Switzerland.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Assisted suicide is still a controversial issue among health and social care providers. They are likely to face challenges in end-of-life care in long-term facilities for older adults, both on organizational and professional levels. Although Swiss professionals are not involved in the final act, they are involved to various extents in the process which leads to the death. Methods: This qualitative study was carried out in 12 facilities in French-speaking Switzerland, which had been faced with requests for suicide assistance from older adults. A total of 36 professionals (physicians, nurses, nursing assistants, social workers, directors) were interviewed. Data were analyzed according to Grounded Theory principles. Results: The results uniquely describe how the process unfolds within facilities, from the initial request for suicide assistance to the aftermath of death. This process gives rise to many questions concerning the most appropriate ethical, professional and organizational way to respond to the requests and provide specific support to the requesting person, their family, and staff within the institution. Institutional life and daily operations are significantly impacted. Major adjustments are required to procedures, usual care routines, resource allocation and communication management within the facility. Institutions that set out a clear framework for the way in which the request is handled and provide sufficient and appropriate support for staff are the least disrupted, not only in terms of their operations, but also in terms of cohesion within teams and relationships between care teams and management.Throughout the process, communication within the institution is fundamental to enable staff members to find their bearings and make sense of the situation. Discussion: Several cross-cutting issues are identified: the need to strike a balance between respecting the procedures laid down by law or the directives of professional associations, and the need to open up spaces for exchange and the construction of meaning for those involved in the process. Further issues include the preparation and training of professionals, and the support provided to them throughout the process. Training and support seem critical to maintaining the continuity and quality of care, motivation and the health of staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.