Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134970›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2024

Radiomics-based machine learning role in differential diagnosis between small renal oncocytoma and clear cells carcinoma on contrast-enhanced CT: A pilot study.

Roberto Francischello, Salvatore Claudio Fanni, Martina Chiellini, Maria Febi, Giorgio Pomara, Claudio Bandini, Lorenzo Faggioni, Riccardo Lencioni, Emanuele Neri, Dania Cioni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roberto FrancischelloDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Salvatore Claudio FanniDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Martina ChielliniDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Maria FebiDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giorgio PomaraAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana UO Urologia Via Roma, Pisa, Italy.
Claudio BandiniDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Lorenzo FaggioniDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Riccardo LencioniDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Emanuele NeriDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Dania CioniDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the potential role of radiomics-based machine learning in differentiating small renal oncocytoma (RO) from clear cells carcinoma (ccRCC) on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Material and methods: Fifty-two patients with small renal masses who underwent CECT before surgery between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively included in the study. At pathology examination 39 ccRCC and 13 RO were identified. All lesions were manually delineated unenhanced (B), arterial (A) and venous (V) phases. Radiomics features were extracted using three different fixed bin widths (bw) of 25 HU, 10 HU, and 5 HU from each phase (B, A, V), and with different combinations (B+A, B+V, B+A+V, A+V), leading to 21 different datasets. Montecarlo Cross Validation technique was used to quantify the estimator performance. The final model built using the hyperparameter selected with Optuna was trained again on the training set and the final performance evaluation was made on the test set. Results: The A+V bw 10 achieved the greater median (IQR) balanced accuracy considering all the models of 0.70 (0.64-0.75), while A bw 10 considering only the monophasic ones. The A bw 10 model achieved a median (IQR) sensitivity of 0.60 (0.40-0.60), specificity of 0.80 (0.73-0.87), AUC-ROC of 0.77 (0.66-0.84), accuracy of 0.75 (0.70-0.80), and a Phi Coefficient of 0.38 (0.20-0.47). None of the nine models with the lowest mean balanced accuracy values implemented features from A. Conclusion: The A bw 10 model was identified as the most efficient mono-phasic model in differentiating small RO from ccRCC.

Indexed as

Clear cells renal carcinomaCTMachine learningRadiomicsRenal OncocytomaSmall renal masses

Identifiers

PMID40134970
PMCPMC11934289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.