Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134893›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025

Analysis of Unused Organ Donors in the Netherlands: Older Donor Age Associated With Higher Risk of Non-Utilization.

K A Chotkan, M A Kuiper, I P J Alwayn, M B A Heemskerk, A E Braat, N E Jansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integrating senotherapeutics into transplantation: liver reconditioning in an aging donor pool.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Review
  3. Association Between Three Lung Donor Scores and Lung Acceptance in DBD and DCD Donors.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K A ChotkanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
M A KuiperDutch Transplant Foundation, Leiden, Netherlands.
I P J AlwaynDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
M B A HeemskerkDutch Transplant Foundation, Leiden, Netherlands.
A E Braat *Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
N E Jansen *Dutch Transplant Foundation, Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to provide objective evidence for the subjectively observed increase in non-utilized donors and to investigate whether they share common risk factors, hypothesizing that the aging of the donor population may be a possible explanation. All referred deceased donors in the Netherlands between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed. A utilized donor was defined as a referred donor that resulted in at least one transplanted organ. A non-utilized donor was defined as a donor from whom no organ was transplanted as a result of the cessation. In total, 2,235 donors were defined as referred; 1,618 donors were utilized and 617 were non-utilized. A significant increase in referred donors aged >66 years was observed, together with an increase of 51% in non-utilized donors. The most frequent reasons for not utilizing a donor were found to be an agonal phase > 2 hours in DCD donors (45%) and an unacceptable medical history at screening (22%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that increasing donor age (age 66-75 years OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.09-3.00), DCD donors (OR 4.37 95% CI 3.24-5.89, p < 0.01), history of hypertension (OR 1.29 95% CI 1.01-1.66, p = 0.04) and/or diabetes (OR 2.48 95% CI 1.75-3.51, p < 0.01) were associated with non-utilization. Non-utilized donors are significantly older, are more often DCD donors and have more co-morbidities, confirming the hypothesis that these donors are the more marginal donors.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsend of life caremarginal donororgan donationorgan transplantationutilization

Identifiers

PMID40134893
PMCPMC11934072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.