Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134889›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Development of a cryptocurrency price prediction model: leveraging GRU and LSTM for Bitcoin, Litecoin and Ethereum.

Ramneet Kaur, Mudita Uppal, Deepali Gupta, Sapna Juneja, Syed Yasser Arafat, Junaid Rashid, Jungeun Kim, Roobaea Alroobaea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ramneet KaurChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Mudita UppalChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2658-4369
Deepali GuptaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Sapna JunejaKIET Group of Institutions, Ghaziabad, India.
Syed Yasser ArafatMirpur University of Science and Technology, Mirpur, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-2121-1865
Junaid RashidDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of South Korea.
Jungeun KimDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of South Korea.
Roobaea AlroobaeaDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1585-2962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptocurrency represents a form of asset that has arisen from the progress of financial technology, presenting significant prospects for scholarly investigations. The ability to anticipate cryptocurrency prices with extreme accuracy is very desirable to researchers and investors. However, time-series data presents significant challenges due to the nonlinear nature of the cryptocurrency market, complicating precise price predictions. Several studies have explored cryptocurrency price prediction using various deep learning (DL) algorithms. Three leading cryptocurrencies, determined by market capitalization, Ethereum (ETH), Bitcoin (BTC), and Litecoin (LTC), are examined for exchange rate predictions in this study. Two categories of recurrent neural networks (RNNs), specifically long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU), are employed. Four performance metrics are selected to evaluate the prediction accuracy namely mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) for three cryptocurrencies which demonstrates that GRU model outperforms LSTM. The GRU model was implemented as a two-layer deep learning network, optimized using the Adam optimizer with a dropout rate of 0.2 to prevent overfitting. The model was trained using normalized historical price data sourced from CryptoDataDownload, with an 80:20 train-test split. In this work, GRU qualifies as the best algorithm for developing a cryptocurrency price prediction model. MAPE values for BTC, LTC and ETH are 0.03540, 0.08703 and 0.04415, respectively, which indicate that GRU offers the most accurate forecasts as compared to LSTM. These prediction models are valuable for traders and investors, offering accurate cryptocurrency price predictions. Future studies should also consider additional variables, such as social media trends and trade volumes that may impact cryptocurrency pricing.

Indexed as

BitcoinCryptocurrencyDeep learningEthereumGated recurrent unitLitecoinLong short-term memoryPrice prediction

Identifiers

PMID40134889
PMCPMC11935774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.