Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134876›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Optimizing forensic file classification: enhancing SFCS with β

D Paul Joseph, Viswanathan Perumal

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D Paul JosephSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology University, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India.
Viswanathan PerumalDepartment of IoT, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology University, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9337-8760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In forensic topical modelling, the α parameter controls the distribution of topics in documents. However, low, high, or incorrect values of α lead to topic sparsity, model overfitting, and suboptimal topic distribution. To control the word distribution across topics, the β parameter is introduced. However, low, high, or inappropriate β values lead to sparse distribution, disjointed topics, and abundant highly probable words. The β

Indexed as

Blacklisted keywordsDigital forensicsDisc forensicsForensic data classificationForensic seed wordsForensic topic modellingMetadata

Identifiers

PMID40134876
PMCPMC11935782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.