Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134875›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Enhancing market trend prediction using convolutional neural networks on Japanese candlestick patterns.

Edrees Ramadan Mersal, Kürşat Mustafa Karaoğlan, Hakan Kutucu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edrees Ramadan MersalDepartment of Computer Engineering, Karabuk University, Karabuk, Turkey.
Kürşat Mustafa KaraoğlanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Karabuk University, Karabuk, Turkey.
Hakan KutucuDepartment of Software Engineering, Karabuk University, Karabuk, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study discusses using Japanese candlestick (JC) patterns to predict future price movements in financial markets. The history of candlestick trading dates back to the 17th century and involves the analysis of patterns formed during JC trading. Candlestick patterns are practical tools for the technical analysis of traders in financial markets. They may serve as indicators of traders' documents of a potential change in market sentiment and trend direction. This study aimed to predict the following candle-trend-based JC charts using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). In order to enhance the accuracy of predicting the directional movement of subsequent financial candlesticks, a rich dataset has been constructed by following a structured three-step process, and a CNN model has been trained. Initially, the dataset was analyzed, and sub-charts were generated using a sliding window technique. Subsequently, the Ta-lib library was used to identify whether predefined patterns were present within the windows. The third phase involved the classification of each window's directional tendency, which was substantiated by employing various technical indicators to validate the direction of the trend. Following the data preparation and analysis phases, a CNN model was developed to extract features from sub-charts and facilitate precise predictions effectively. The experimental results of this approach demonstrated a remarkable predictive accuracy of up to 99.3%. Implementing cross-validation techniques is essential to verify the reliability and overall performance of the model. To achieve this goal, the dataset was divided into several small subsets. Subsequently, the model was trained and evaluated multiple times using different combinations of these subsets. This method allows for a more accurate assessment of the model's predictive capabilities by examining its performance on unseen data.

Indexed as

Buy-sell strategyCNNCross-validationJapanese candlestickStock market

Identifiers

PMID40134875
PMCPMC11935771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.