ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Enhanced transformer for length-controlled abstractive summarization based on summary output area.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in abstractive summarization models, particularly those built on encoder-decoder architectures, typically produce a single summary for each source text. Controlling the length of summaries is crucial for practical applications, such as crafting cover summaries for newspapers or magazines with varying slot sizes. Current research in length-controllable abstractive summarization employs techniques like length embeddings in the decoder module or a word-level extractive module in the encoder-decoder model. However, these approaches, while effective in determining when to halt decoding, fall short in selecting relevant information to include within the specified length constraint. This article diverges from prior models reliant on predefined lengths. Instead, it introduces a novel approach to length-controllable abstractive summarization by integrating an image processing phase. This phase determines the specific size of the summary output slot. The proposed model harnesses enhanced T5 and GPT models, seamlessly adapting summaries to designated slots. The computed area of a given slot is employed in both models to generate abstractive summaries tailored to fit the output slot perfectly. Experimental evaluations on the CNN/Daily Mail dataset demonstrate the model's success in performing length-controlled summarization, yielding superior results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.