ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025
Rationale and design of the acetazolamide as a chloride sparing diuretic in patients admitted with heart failure (ADA-HF) trial.
Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ADA-HF: acetazolamide as a chloride sparing diuretic in patients admitted to hospital with heart failure.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The Acetazolamide as a chloride-sparing Diuretic in patients Admitted with Heart Failure (ADA-HF) trial will assess the safety and diuretic effect of oral ACZ given alongside a high-dose IV loop diuretic in patients admitted to the hospital with heart failure (HF) and severe fluid retention. Hypochloraemia is common in patients with HF and is associated with worse outcomes, but there are few treatment options available: we will also assess whether ACZ reduces urine chloride loss. Methods and results: The ADA-HF trial is a single centre, open-label, randomized-controlled trial of ACZ 250 mg twice daily plus standard care vs. standard care alone. The trial duration is 4 days. We will recruit 50 patients with severe peripheral oedema due to HF requiring standard care (240 mg of IV furosemide per day given via continuous infusion at 10 mg per hour). The co-primary endpoints are (1) the difference in net fluid loss daily, and over 4 days; and (2) difference in serum chloride concentrations between baseline and day 4. The trial has 80% power to detect a difference in fluid balance of 500-1000 mL per day; and a difference in serum chloride concentration of 1 mmol/L per day. Secondary endpoints include but are not limited to: time to recruit per patient; rate of adverse events; rate of recruitment; and cause-specific rate of drop-out of the study. Conclusion: ACZ may be a useful adjunct to diuretic therapy, but the safety and diuretic efficacy of oral ACZ when used alongside high-dose loop diuretics is unknown. ADA-HF will complement the ADVOR trial and may clarify what role ACZ may have for patients with severe congestion. Trial registration: ISRCTN registry. ISRCTN13060336. Registered on 09/02/2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13060336.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.