Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134834›Full record

ReviewUS cardiology2025

Navigating Digital Medical Education in the Current Era: Process Over Platform.

Gurleen Kaur, Saman Nematollahi, Thomas Das

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in US cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gurleen KaurDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, MA.
Saman NematollahiDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, AZ.
Thomas DasHeart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the dawn of advanced technological and digital resources, medical education has changed. Learners are now able to learn, share, and communicate medical knowledge through online discussion forums, blogs, videos, podcasts, infographics, virtual communities, social media platforms, and collaborative author groups. Navigating these digital education modalities can be challenging, with each platform presenting unique challenges and opportunities. Digital educators need to learn how to navigate this uncertain territory, equipped with a skillset applicable to all digital spaces. This article explores the key components of a digital educator's skillset by examining the core foundations of learning theory, creation of digital education materials, and virtual communities of practice.

Indexed as

adult learning theoryMedical educationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID40134834
PMCPMC11934123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.