ArticleOrthopedic reviews2025
Enhanced Pain Relief with Catheter-Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Case Series of Patients with Unilateral Lumbar Radicular Pain.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Utility of Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Comprehensive Review.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection Approaches: A Practical Overview for Trainees.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Protectin DX alleviates lumbar radicular pain in rats by suppressing RIP3/MLKL-associated necroinflammation through restoration of autophagic function.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Retrospective Pilot Study of Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- Understanding the Landscape of Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections: A Review of Interlaminar, Transforaminal, and Caudal Approaches.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a common intervention for lumbar radicular pain, but responses can be variable. When initial injections provide suboptimal relief, targeted approaches using an epidural catheter may enhance efficacy. Case Series: We describe three patients with unilateral lumbar radicular pain who underwent caudal ESIs using a 22-gauge spinal needle. Each patient experienced suboptimal pain relief following the initial injection. Patient 1 reported only 30% improvement at the 2-week follow-up. Patient 2 initially experienced 80% pain relief, but this improvement lasted only 3 days, returning to baseline by the 2-week follow-up. Patient 3 reported 40% improvement at the 2-week follow-up. Given their limited response, all three patients underwent a repeat caudal ESI using an epidural catheter advanced toward the symptomatic side and area of interest. After the catheter-guided injection, Patient 1 experienced 70% pain relief, Patient 2 achieved 60% relief, and Patient 3 reported 100% relief, all assessed at the 2-week follow-up. Conclusion: This case series highlights the potential benefit of catheter-guided caudal ESIs in patients with suboptimal responses to single-shot caudal injections. The improved outcomes suggest that targeted epidural drug delivery may enhance pain relief in select cases of unilateral lumbar radicular pain. Further research is needed to evaluate this approach's long-term efficacy and optimal patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.