ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
First prospective, single-arm, multicenter study to evaluate safety and efficacy of the overall thrombectomy system -iNedit, iNdeep, and iNtercept- for acute ischemic stroke. Rationale beyond the study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05893719 (First Prospective, Single-arm, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Overall Thrombectomy System for Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
First Prospective, Single-arm, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Overall Thrombectomy System for Stroke: iNedit, iNdeep and iNtercept in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale: The clinical impact of a novel mechanical thrombectomy strategy, which integrates distal access with flow reversal and flow arrest via a distal balloon, all within a single procedure [Safety and Efficacy of the overall throMbectomy system for sTroke (SEMTiC) strategy], has not been tested. Aim: The SEMTiC-01 study is the first prospective, multicenter Sample size estimates: The study was designed with a sequential structure based on the efficacy endpoint (eTICI ≥2b) reported in the literature [71.1% with a 95% confidence interval of (68.5%, 73.8%)]. An interim analysis was set for 115 patients and a final analysis for 225 patients, ensuring 98% power at a one-sided 0.025 significance level, with a 2.6% non-inferiority margin and a 15% assumed withdrawal rate. Design: SEMTiC-01 is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label clinical safety and efficacy investigation. Outcome: Primary efficacy endpoint: expanded treatment in cerebral infarction score (eTICI) ≥2b revascularization within ≤ 3 stent retriever passes. Primary safety endpoint: monitoring serious adverse events within 24 h post-intervention and all-cause mortality at 90 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.